Skip to main content

Press "Enter" to search or "ESC" to close.

Judge Blocks Trump and Protects Funds for Thousands of Homeless People in Los Angeles

A federal judge blocked a Trump administration measure that affected resources intended to address the housing crisis in Los Angeles.
Share on FacebookShare on InstagramShare on TwitterShare on TikTokShare on YouTubeShare on WhatsApp
juez frena a trump personas hogar
FOTO: Shutterstock
  • Judge blocks Trump administration measure
  • LAHSA regains access to funds
  • Los Angeles faces housing crisis

A federal judge in California on Thursday blocked a measure by President Donald Trump’s administration that sought to prevent Los Angeles’ main homeless services agency from accessing federal funds, a decision that once again puts the future of assistance for thousands of people in the region at the center of the debate.

The ruling restores the ability of the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority (LAHSA) to apply for approximately $240 million that would benefit around 140 service providers dedicated to combating homelessness.

Judge Rules Government Acted Arbitrarily in Suspending LAHSA

juez, trump, frena, los angeles, personas, sin hogar
FOTO: Shutterstock

U.S. District Judge David O. Carter ruled in his order that the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development acted arbitrarily when it decided in June to suspend LAHSA from accessing federal grant programs.

The court’s decision represents a setback for the Trump administration’s attempt to change how these resources are managed and, for now, restores the Los Angeles agency’s ability to apply for the funds.

However, Carter did not dismiss concerns about possible financial mismanagement within LAHSA, arguments the federal government had used as justification for cutting the agency off from the funds.

Carter Warns Abruptly Ending Services Could Have Catastrophic Consequences

In his order, the judge made clear that the dispute is not limited to the agency’s internal operations, but also involves the consequences that a sudden suspension of funding could have on people who depend on its services.

“LAHSA may be dysfunctional. However, thousands of homeless people depend on these services. It may be a sound policy decision to stop providing services through LAHSA. It is not this Court’s role to make that decision. However, any transition must be gradual and planned so that it does not leave catastrophic consequences,” the order stated.

With that argument, Carter indicated that any changes in the management of funds intended to fight homelessness would have to be carried out in a planned manner to avoid directly affecting people who receive assistance.

More Than 72,000 People Remain Homeless in Los Angeles County

The ruling comes as Los Angeles continues to face one of its most serious social challenges, even though the latest figures show a decline in the number of people experiencing homelessness.

More than 72,000 people in Los Angeles County were without housing in February, when LAHSA conducted a count to determine the size of the homeless population in the region.

The survey, released on July 14, reported a 4% decline for the second consecutive year, although the scale of the problem remains significant.

Despite those modest decreases, homelessness continues to be one of California’s most important social and structural challenges, particularly because of the large number of people who still depend on assistance programs and service providers.

Los Angeles Still Needs More Than 485,000 Affordable Homes

juez, los angeles, california, homeless, personas, hogar
FOTO: Shutterstock

The scale of the problem is also reflected in the region’s need for affordable housing, an issue that extends beyond the legal dispute over who should manage federal funds.

LAHSA said in its latest report that the region still needs more than 485,000 affordable homes to meet current demand.

Carter’s order allows LAHSA to once again apply for approximately $240 million intended for service providers, but it does not resolve concerns surrounding the agency’s management.

The ruling primarily establishes that any eventual transition to a different model for managing the funds cannot be carried out abruptly if doing so risks leaving thousands of homeless people in Los Angeles without services.