Skip to main content

Press "Enter" to search or "ESC" to close.

Alligator Alcatraz: The New Epicenter of Deportations in the U.S.

Alligator Alcatraz first month as an immigration detention center in Florida, amid mass deportations and allegations of inhumane conditions.
Share on FacebookShare on InstagramShare on TwitterShare on TikTokShare on YouTubeShare on WhatsApp
Carcel, Asesinato, MundoNOW, Alligator Alcatraz: The New Epicenter of Deportations in the U.S.
Foto: Shutterstock
  • Alligator Alcatraz: Migrant center marks one month
  • Opacity and abuse reported
  • Florida seeks national replication

Alligator Alcatraz, a controversial immigration detention center in Florida, marks its first month of operations with over 600 deportations carried out, solidifying its role as a model for immigration policy under the Trump Administration.

Although the state government presents it as an efficient deportation “hub,” civil organizations denounce abuses, lack of transparency, and inhumane conditions.

Alligator Alcatraz, the new face of immigration detention

alligator, alcatraz, prision, inmigrantes, carcel, Alligator Alcatraz: The New Epicenter of Deportations in the U.S.What is Alligator Alcatraz?

Built in just one week on an old airport surrounded by swamps and alligators in the Everglades, this center was established by order of Governor Ron DeSantis, who considers it a blueprint for future immigration projects.

However, activists see it as a symbol of repression and human rights violations.

“This Everglades detention camp is a grotesque example of government overreach, where through excess, they are now seeking to build these expanding detention camps,” said Jeff Migliozzi, spokesperson for Freedom For Immigrants.

Since July 3, at least 1,000 migrants have been detained there, according to figures from the Florida Immigrant Coalition (FLIC).

DeSantis estimated that, in just two weeks, 600 people were deported via flights operated by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

Capacity, opacity, and complaints

The center currently has space for 2,000 people, but the Florida Division of Emergency Management (FDEM) plans to expand it to 4,000. Democratic lawmakers reported seeing 750 migrants “in cages” during a visit on July 12.

Added to this is the opacity of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), which does not include Alligator Alcatraz in its statistics.

“They were holding people in Alligator Alcatraz in Florida and it wasn’t listed (in ICE statistics), and there are all these media reports about how people are being held there,” warned Susan B. Long, co-founder of the TRAC project.

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN: Lawmakers Sue Trump for Blocking Oversight of Migrant Detention Centers

A model in expansion

The White House has already contacted five Republican-led states to replicate Florida’s model, confirmed Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem.

In addition, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) announced $608 million for new migrant centers.

The total projected investment for ICE through 2029 is $45 billion.

“Florida has been a leader in this, and I know the White House has called other states to follow what Florida is doing,” stated DeSantis.

Legal and environmental backlash

The immigration detention center faces two lawsuits: one led by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) alongside Americans for Immigrant Justice, and another by environmental groups such as Friends of the Everglades and the Center for Biological Diversity.

Both legal actions denounce the lack of clarity about the responsible authority and the legal gaps that prevent accountability for inhumane conditions and environmental damage.

“This is an unprecedented situation in which hundreds of detainees are held incommunicado, without access to courts, under an authority that has never been explained and may not even exist,” reads the ACLU lawsuit.

The outlook

As Alligator Alcatraz establishes itself as a testing ground for the new federal immigration policy, the legal and activist struggle is only beginning.

The future of such centers—their legitimacy and operational conditions—will be scrutinized by the courts, civil society, and the international community.

Do you think this type of center should be replicated in other states, or does it represent a setback for human rights?

SOURCE: EFE